Publications / Iraq - Angry Hearts and Angry Minds / 1.3 Neutralising terror in Iraq: isolate extremists and implement microsecurity initiatives
Section I: SITREP - Iraq's militias and armed groups

1.1 Overview: Iraq’s current security landscape

1.2 Differentiating Iraq’s militias and armed groups

1.3 Neutralising terror in Iraq: isolate extremists and implement microsecurity initiatives

1.4 Most wanted: grassroots micro-security initiatives

1.5 Drug trafficking: international criminals capitalising on Iraq’s insecurity



1.3 Neutralising terror in Iraq: isolate extremists and implement microsecurity initiatives

Build on current small security successes to enable grassroots micro-security initiatives

The relative calm afforded by the mid-2007 surge of US troops in Iraq provides an opportunity for the Coalition to support the development of democracy in Iraq by cementing the positive effects of recent security developments such as the co-opting of local groups in security management and the ongoing evolution of the Concerned Local Citizens across sectarian lines. However, caution must be exercised to ensure that the inclusion of local groups in the provision of security does not equate to (and is not perceived by Iraqis as equating to) international support for sectarian divisions within Iraq’s institutions, because such divisions directly contradict the basic democratic principles that must be embedded within the country’s structures and institutions of governance.

There now exists an opportunity to break down sectarian militia blocs into individual groups, and in doing so, create the space to implement the grassroots micro-security initiatives necessary to neutralise mechanisms of self-sustaining internal violence, and to draw Iraq’s various communities back together again. Isolating and defeating the most extreme armed groups and militias will enable the Coalition to devote energy and resources to securing the development of the small-medium enterprises in Iraq communities that will provide jobs for young Iraqi men who would otherwise seek work with militias.

“Unemployed people join the militias for the money.”

Unemployed, 20
Baghdad, May 2008


Billboard on road to Abu Ghraib which reads: “Together, our future is Iraq”, May 2008

Divide to conquer Iraq’s militias and armed groups

The armed groups and militias currently operating in Iraq can be classified into three main layers, divided according to level of affiliation with members of the Iraqi government and its security forces, the United States military, or the Iranian security forces. Each tier is further divided by ethno-sectarian leanings. Although some groups remain militantly opposed to both the Shia-dominated Iraq government and its US supporters, many groups are either directly affiliated with political parties within the current Iraq parliament (those groups in the green zone of the following diagram), or have begun to demonstrate a willingness to enhance their legitimacy by operating within Iraq’s existing formal political structures.

As such, the current configuration of Iraq’s militias and armed groups represents an important opportunity for the Iraq government and its allies to stabilise the country’s security and political landscapes. Positive engagement with middle layer (orange) armed groups could provide the political space within which to conduct the targeted counterinsurgency and counter-terrorist efforts against the (red) most violent of the Iran-backed Shia “special groups” militias, former Baathist Regime elements, and Al Qaeda in Iraq.


Why reach out to mid-level armed groups now?

Currently, the mid-layer groups remain somewhat homogenous and the leaders (where they exist) continue to have some measure of control over, or at least access to, the most extreme elements of the groups. However, this situation is unlikely to remain static.

Iran is actively courting the more extreme elements of al-Sadr’s Jaish al Mahdi group as a hedge against the potential political failure of its current ally SIIC. It could prove extremely difficult to reach out to these groups once they are under Iran control – particularly if the United States maintains its stance of ignoring Iran.

“Iran and the USA are the cause of all of Iraq’s problems.”

Student
Baghdad, May 2008


In addition, US domestic pressure is mounting over the spiralling cost of the Iraq war, and it is likely that continuing to fund the Sons of Iraq/Concerned Local Citizens groups is unsustainable for the United States even in the medium term. However, a failure by the US to balance any cut in funding with sustainable livelihood opportunities could be perceived as a broken promise, and the resulting disillusionment could result in Sunni armed groups turning back to Al Qaeda in Iraq or disruptive criminal activity like drug smuggling.

Bomb-damaged building on Baghdad’s Sadoon Street, May 2008



Previous Next